This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rowe, J. Articles by Barer, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rowe, J. Articles by Barer, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A regional specialty policy for pressure sores

Elderly Care Medicine, Moseley Hall Hospital, Birmingham

David Barer

Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne

A survey of pressure sores in Mersey's geriatric units revealed almost universal access to high technology equipment but limited availability of specialist skills and knowledge. Many wounds were treated with toxic or inappropriate agents. Consequently a regional specialty policy for pressure sores, incorporating a tissue viability formulary, was introduced. A second audit investigated its effects.

The prevalence, grade, ages and anatomical sites affected were very similar in the two studies. Patients receiving a pressure sore risk assessment increased, from 157/170 (92%) to 186/187 (99.5%) (p <0.0005). Prior to the introduction of the policy 74/272 (27%) pressure sores had an unsuitable cleanser, cavity filler or dressing compared with 51/309 (16%) subsequently (p <0.005).

This regional specialty audit has improved the management of pressure sores in 10 units.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 3, 262-266 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900314


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?