SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duddy, J.
Right arrow Articles by McLellan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duddy, J.
Right arrow Articles by McLellan, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lack of influence of EMG biofeedback in relaxation training for spasmodic torticollis

J. Duddy

Defence Services Medical Rehabilitation Unit, Royal Air Force, Headley Court, Epsom Surrey KT18 6JN, UK

DL McLellan

University Rehabilitation Research Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton

Reports in the American and Japanese literature have suggested that electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback is effective in the treatment of spasmodic torticollis but no conclusive evidence has been reported from controlled studies. A controlled study was therefore undertaken in 11 subjects with spasmodic torticollis. Five patients were randomly allocated to a course of television- monitored relaxation while the remaining six were treated with television- monitored relaxation plus EMG biofeedback. The effects of intervention were assessed by questionnaires, clinical assessment and measurement of integrated EMG activity in both sternomastoid muscles during a five-minute observation period under controlled conditions. The subjects' range of voluntary neck movements and their capacity to suppress their involuntary movements were measured using a computer-assisted movement detection system (Coda 3, Charnwood Dynamics) and standardized videotape recordings, the latter being assessed by two experienced clinicians who did not know the sequence of the recordings. Subjective improvements in symptoms were reported in both groups of subjects, who appeared to gain from the opportunity to discuss harrowing aspects of their experience. However, these subjective results were not associated with any significant changes in the objective measures used and thus provided no support for the use of EMG biofeedback in torticollis.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 4, 297-303 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement