Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prada, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tallis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prada, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tallis, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Treatment of the neglect syndrome in stroke patients using a contingency electrical stimulator

Gabriel Prada

University of Manchester Department of Geriatric Medicine, Manchester

Raymond Tallis

University of Manchester Department of Geriatric Medicine, Manchester — Department of Geriatric Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, Salford Royal Hospitals Trust, Eccles Old Road, Salford M6 8HD, UK

Two patients with major infarcts in the right middle cerebral artery territory associated with severe perceptual problems including tactile neglect were treated with a contingency electrical stimulator. This delivered electrical stimuli to the forearm skin on the neglected side whenever the patient moved the contralateral normal arm, with the intention of drawing the patient's attention to the neglected side. The effect of this treatment was assessed in a single case design using the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery.

Both patients had a statistically significant improvement in tests of perceptual function during the period of the study. In addition, there was a significant difference between the treatment and the baseline periods: the differences between the slopes of the regression lines fitted to the scores were statistically significant, favouring the treatment periods. This supported the inference that the changes were at least in part due to the treatment rather than merely the natural history of the disease.

These results suggest that this approach to treating an otherwise intractable condition should be further investigated.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 4, 304-313 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Turner-Stokes and D. Jackson
Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2002; 16(3): 276 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C I. Price and A D Pandyan
Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 5 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J A Edmans, J Webster, and N B Lincoln
A comparison of two approaches in the treatment of perceptual problems after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2000; 14(3): 230 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Editorial
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1998; 12(2): 95 - 97.
[PDF]



Advertisement