|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 12,
1075-1086 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507079843
Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study
K.-C. Lin
School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
C.-Y. Wu
Graduate Institute of Clinical Behavioral Science and Department of Occupational Therapy, cywu{at}mail.cgu.edu.tw
T.-H. Wei
Graduate Institute of Clinical Behavioral Science and Department of Occupational Therapy
Chang Gung
University, Taoyuan
C.-Y. Lee
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei
J.-S. Liu
Department of Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Objective: To evaluate changes in (1) motor control characteristics of the hemiparetic hand during the performance of a functional reach-to-grasp task and (2) functional performance of daily activities in patients with stroke treated with modified constraint-induced movement therapy.
Design: Two-group randomized controlled trial with pretreatment and posttreatment measures.
Setting: Rehabilitation clinics.
Subjects: Thirty-two chronic stroke patients (21 men, 11 women; mean age=57.9 years, range=43—81 years) 13—26 months (mean 16.3 months) after onset of a first-ever cerebrovascular accident.
Intervention: Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive modified constraint-induced movement therapy (restraint of the unaffected limb combined with intensive training of the affected limb) or traditional rehabilitation for three weeks.
Main measures: Kinematic analysis was used to assess motor control characteristics as patients reached to grasp a beverage can. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Motor Activity Log and Functional Independence Measure.
Results: There were moderate and significant effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on some aspects of motor control of reach-to-grasp and on functional ability. The modified constraint-induced movement therapy group preplanned reaching and grasping (P=0.018) more efficiently and depended more on the feedforward control of reaching (P=0.046) than did the traditional rehabilitation group. The modified constraint-induced movement therapy group also showed significantly improved functional performance on the Motor Activity Log (P<0.0001) and the Functional Independence Measure (P=0.016).
Conclusions: In addition to improving functional use of the affected arm and daily functioning, modified constraint-induced movement therapy improved motor control strategy during goal-directed reaching, a possible mechanism for the improved movement performance of stroke patients undergoing this therapy.
References
- Carr J., Shepherd R. Neurological rehabilitation: optimizing motor performance. Butterworth-Heineman 1998; 242—64.
- Grotta JC, Noser EA, Ro T., et al. Constraintinduced movement therapy. Stroke 2004; 35 (suppl 1): 2699—701.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Miltner W., Bauder H., Sommer M., Dettmers C., Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586—92.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Page S., Sisto S., Johnston M., Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 290—95.[Abstract]
- Page S., Levine P., Leonard A. Modified constraintinduced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 27—32.[Abstract]
- van der Lee J., Wagenaar R., Lankhorst G., Vogelaar T., Deville W., Bouter L. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369—75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1867—73.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 31: 2984—88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Brogårdh C., Sjölund BH Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 218—27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Alberts J., Bulter A., Wolf S. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004; 18: 250—58.[Abstract]
- Platz T., Bock S., Prass K. Reduced skillfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 687—98.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hakim RM, Kelly SJ, Grant-Beuttler M., Healy B., Krempasky JM, Moore S. Case report: a modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) program for the upper extremity of a person with chronic stroke. Physiother Theory Pract 2005; 21: 243—56.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Huang YY, Wu CY, Hong WH, Chen CL, Lin KC A kinematic study of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke. Formosan J Med 2006; 10: 319—27.[ISI]
- Carr J., Shepherd R. Stroke rehabilitation: guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. Butterworth Heinemann, 2003.
- Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4: 423—31.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Trombly C. Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 887—97.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kristeva R., Chakarov V., Wagner M., Schulte-Monting J., Hepp-Reymond MC Is the movement-evoked potential mandatory for movement execution? A high-resolution EEG study in a deafferented patient. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 677—85.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Seidler RD, Noll DC, Thiers G. Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 1775—83.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Levin M. Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 1996; 119: 281—93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schmidt RA, Lee TD Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, fourth edition. Human Kinetics, 2005.
- Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M., Tashman JS A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In Fuhrer MJ ed. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Brookes, 1987: 137—47.
- Uswatte G., Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In Struss DT, Winocur G, Robertson IH eds. Cognitive neurorehabilitation: a comprehensive approach. Cambridge University Press, 1999: 215—29.
- Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. Harper & Row, 1970.
- Teng EL, Chui HC The modified Mini-Mental State Exam. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48: 314—18.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bohannon R., Smith M. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 206—207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Taub E., Morris D., Bowman M., Delgado A., Uswatte G. Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log [Manual]. Available from Edward Taub, Psychology Department, UAB, CH415, Birmingham, AL, USA, 2000.
- Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6—18.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bhimji S., Deroy AR, Baskin ES, Hillstrom HJ Static and dynamic accuracy of the VICON 370 3-D kinematic system. Gait Posture 2000; 11: 130.
- van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Knol DL, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 1410—14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., Vignolo M., McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005; 36: 2493—96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris K., Light K., Thompson PA The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006; 67: 1189—94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chau N., Daler S., Andre JM, Patris A. Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 63—71.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hamilton B., Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 115—19.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 531—36.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gosman-Hedstrom G., Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 702—15.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Brooks V., Watts S. Adaptive programming of arm movements. J Mot Behav 1988; 20: 117—32.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nagasaki H. Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements. Exp Brain Res 1989; 74: 319—26.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grosskopf A., Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res 2006; 168: 230—40.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Volman MJ, Wijnroks A., Vermeer A. Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 684—92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wu C., Trombly C., Lin K., Tickle-Degnen L. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 95—101.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stevens JP Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, fourth edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, second edition. Erlbaum, 1988.
- Sabes P. The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000; 10: 740—46.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Michaelsen S., Jacobs S., Roby-Brami A., Levin M. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2004; 157: 162—73.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Harvey M., Jackson SR, Newport R., Kramer T., Morris DL, Dow L. Is grasping impaired in hemispatial neglect? Behav Neurol 2001/2002; 13: 17—28.[ISI]
- Thielman G., Dean C., Gentile A. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1613—18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Higgins J., Salbach NM, Wood-Dauphinee S., Richards CL, Côté R., Mayo NE The effect of a task-oriented intervention on arm function in people with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 296—310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L Wolf
On "Modified constraint-induced therapy..." Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.
Physical Therapy,
May 1, 2008;
88(5):
680 - 684.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|