Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Daisley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Daisley, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 12, 1097-1108 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507079833

Including children in family-focused acquired brain injury rehabilitation: a national survey of rehabilitation staff practice

Guinevere Webster

Oxford Centre for Enablement, Oxford, now at National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, guinevere.webster{at}buckshosp.nhs.uk

Audrey Daisley

Oxford Centre for Enablement, Oxford, UK

Objective: To establish whether rehabilitation staff work regularly with child relatives of adults with acquired brain injury to involve them in their family member's rehabilitation. To explore factors influencing rehabilitation staff's decisions about involving child relatives.

Design: A cross-sectional postal survey design was used for the main study. Questionnaire packs were sent to rehabilitation staff, followed by a reminder letter one week later. Non-responders received a follow-up pack after three weeks.

A prospective design was used with a subsample of participants who re-completed the questionnaire one month later.

Subjects: Participants were 393 multidisciplinary staff working in rehabilitation services for adults with acquired brain injury throughout the UK.

Main measures: A questionnaire based on the theory of planned behaviour was designed specially for the purposes of the study.

Results: A response rate of 67% (n = 263) was obtained. Few respondents (19%, n = 50) reported carrying out work with child relatives. Perceived behavioural control (e.g. access to training, resources and support) significantly predicted staff's intention to work with child relatives, and whether they carried this out. Staff's attitudes towards work with child relatives also significantly predicted intentions. Other influential factors were anxiety, training, work setting and perceptions of colleagues' attitudes.

Conclusions: Little work is carried out with child relatives by acquired brain injury rehabilitation staff, influenced by several factors. A priority in addressing this is to provide staff training.

References

  • Brooks DN The head-injured family. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991; 13: 155—88.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Maitz EA Family systems theory applied to head injury. In Williams JM, Kay T eds. Head injury: a family matter. Paul H Brookes, 1991: 65—79.
  • Maitz EA, Sachs PR Treating families of individuals with traumatic brain injury from a family systems perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995; 10: 1—11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sander AM, Caroselli JS, High WM, Becker C., Neese L., Scheibel R. Relationship of family functioning to progress in a post-acute rehabilitation programme following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2002; 16: 649—57.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Oddy M., Herbert C. Intervention with families following brain injury: Evidence-based practice. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2003; 13: 259—73.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Rosenthal M., Young T. Effective family intervention after traumatic brain injury: theory and practice. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1988; 3: 42—50.[CrossRef]
  • Daisley A. Psychological adjustment of children to parental brain injury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle, 2002.
  • Urbach JR, Culbert JP Head-injured parents and their children: psychosocial consequences of a traumatic syndrome. Psychosomatics 1991; 32: 24—33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Daisley A., Webster G. Familial brain injury: impact on and interventions with children. In Tyerman AD, King NS eds. Psychological approaches to rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. BPS Blackwell, 2008.
  • Harris JKJ, Godfrey HPD, Partridge FM, Knight RG Caregiver depression following traumatic brain injury (TBI): a consequence of adverse effects on family members?. Brain Inj 2001; 15: 223—38.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Department of Health. The National Service Framework for Long Term Conditions. Crown Copyright, 2005.
  • Jones A., Scannell T. Research and organizational issues for the implementation of family work in community psychiatric services. J Adv Nurs 2002; 38: 171—79.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Titler MG, Cohen MZ, Craft MJ Impact of adult critical care hospitalization: perceptions of patients, spouses, children and nurses. Heart Lung 1991; 20: 174—82.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179—211.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Conner M., Sparks P. The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In Conner M, Norman P eds. Predicting health behaviour. Open University Press, 1995: 121—62.
  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, 1980.
  • Ajzen I., Madden TJ Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. J Exp Soc Psychol 1986; 22: 453—74.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Open University Press, 1988.
  • Vermette L., Godin G. Nurses' intentions to provide home care: the impact of AIDS and homosexuality. AIDS Care 1996; 8: 479—88.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Paton ML, Hellawell DJ Directory of rehabilitation services for people with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, orthopaedic injuries and burns. Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Astley Ainslie Hospital, University of Edinburgh, 1999.
  • Dillman DA Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
  • Whitehead S. Health professionals discussion of dementia with older adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University, 1997.
  • McCarty MC, Hennrikus DJ, Lando HA, Vessey JT Nurses' attitudes concerning the delivery of brief cessation advice to hospitalized smokers. Prev Med 2001; 33: 674—81.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jenner EA, Watson PWB, Miller L., Jones F., Scott GM Explaining hand hygiene: An extended application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Psychol Health Med 2002; 7: 311—26.[CrossRef]
  • Puffer S., Rashidian A. Practice nurses' intentions to use clinical guidelines. J Adv Nurs 2004; 47: 500—509.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Granoff MJC. An examination of factors that influence the healthcare professionals' intent to adopt practice guideline innovation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2002; 63: 722.
  • Deffner JM, Bell SK Nurses' death anxiety, comfort level during communication with patients and families regarding death, and exposure to communication education: a quantitative study. J Nurses Staff Dev 2005; 21: 19—23.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Thompson A., Whitney L., Whyte J. Developing links between child and family psychiatry and an adult mental health service. Clin Psychol Forum 2000; 140: 21—23.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Daisley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webster, G.
Right arrow Articles by Daisley, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?