This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215509102947v1 23/7/659    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vrieling, A. H Articles by Postema, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vrieling, A. H Articles by Postema, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Gait adjustments in obstacle crossing, gait initiation and gait termination after a recent lower limb amputation

¹ Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
² Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
³ Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, The Netherlands
⁴ Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.h.vrieling{at}cvr.umcg.nl.

	Abstract

Objective: To describe the adjustments in gait characteristics of obstacle crossing, gait initiation and gait termination that occur in subjects with a recent lower limb amputation during the rehabilitation process.

Design: Prospective and descriptive study.

Subjects: Fourteen subjects with a recent transfemoral, knee disarticulation or transtibial amputation.

Methods: Subjects stepped over an obstacle and initiated and terminated gait at four different times during the rehabilitation process.

Outcome measures: Success rate, gait velocity and lower limb joint angles in obstacle crossing, centre of pressure shift and peak anteroposterior ground reaction force in gait initiation and termination.

Results: In obstacle crossing amputees increased success rate, gait velocity and swing knee flexion of the prosthetic limb. Knee flexion in transfemoral and knee disarticulation amputees was not sufficient for safe obstacle crossing, which resulted in a circumduction strategy. In gait initiation and termination amputees increased the anteroposterior ground reaction force and the centre of pressure shift in the mediolateral direction in both tasks. Throughout the rehabilitation process the centre of pressure was shifted anteriorly before single-limb stance on the trailing prosthetic limb in gait initiation, whereas in gait termination the centre of pressure in single-limb stance remained posterior when leading with the prosthetic limb.

Conclusion: Subjects with a recent amputation develop adjustment strategies to improve obstacle crossing, gait initiation and gait termination. Innovations in prosthetic design or training methods may ease the learning process of these tasks.

First published on May 26, 2009, doi:10.1177/0269215509102947

Clinical Rehabilitation 2009;23:659.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?