This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215509102952v1 23/7/622    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hultenheim Klintberg, I. Articles by Karlsson, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hultenheim Klintberg, I. Articles by Karlsson, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Early loading in physiotherapy treatment after full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized pilot-study with a two-year follow-up

¹ Department of Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
² Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ingrid.hultenheim-klintberg{at}vgregion.se.

	Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical changes following two different physiotherapy treatment protocols after rotator cuff repair.

Design: A prospective, randomized pilot study with a two-year follow-up.

Subjects: Five women and nine men, 55 (40–64) years old, were included.

Intervention: The progressive group (n = 7) started with dynamic, specific muscle activation of the rotator cuff the day after surgery as well as passive range of motion. After four weeks of immobilization the loading to the rotator cuff increased and in a progressive manner throughout the rehabilitation. In the traditional group (n = 7) the rotator cuff was protected from loading. Patients were immobilized for six weeks and started with passive range of motion the day after surgery. No specific exercises to the rotator cuff were introduced during this period.

Main measures: A clinical evaluation was made preoperatively, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Pain rating during activity and at rest, patient satisfaction, active range of motion and muscle strength, Constant score, hand in neck, hand in back and pour out of a pot, as well as Functional Index of the Shoulder were used.

Results: At two years follow-up, the progressive group and traditional group scored pain during activity visual analogue scale (VAS) 2/0 mm and pain at rest 0/0 mm, respectively. The groups attained 170/175° in active abduction in standing and 70/90° in passive external rotation while lying in supine. Using Constant score, the groups attained 82/77 points respectively.

Conclusion: The present study showed that the progressive protocol produced no adverse effects compared with the traditional protocol.

First published on May 29, 2009, doi:10.1177/0269215509102952

Clinical Rehabilitation 2009;23:622.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?