This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by de Kroon, J R Articles by Lankhorst, G J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Kroon, J R Articles by Lankhorst, G J Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Arm Injuries and Disorders Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review

Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede

J H van der Lee

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

M J IJzerman

Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

G J Lankhorst

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Background: Therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) is a therapeutic strategy aimed at improving impairments of the upper extremity in stroke.

Objective: Assessment of the available evidence on the effect of TES of the affected upper extremity in improving motor control and functional abilities after stroke.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have studied the effect of TES on motor control and functional abilities. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed systematically by two raters. The reported outcomes were examined to evaluate the effect of TES and to identify a possible relationship with patient characteristics, method of stimulation and methodological quality. When possible, effect sizes were calculated (Hedges’ g).

Results: Six RCTs were included. The methodological scores ranged from 7 to 16 (maximum 19). All studies assessed the effect on motor control, and four reported a positive effect. Effect sizes calculated in three studies ranged from 0.55 to 1.46. Only two studies assessed the effect on functional ability, one reported a positive effect. Subgroup analyses in two studies suggest a better response to stimulation in less severely affected patients. Apart from this, no relationship between effect and patient characteristics, method of stimulation or methodological quality could be detected.

Conclusions: The present review suggests a positive effect of electrical stimulation on motor control. No conclusions can be drawn with regard to the effect on functional abilities.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 4, 350-360 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr504oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Page, S. Maslyn, V. H. Hermann, A. Wu, K. Dunning, and P. G. Levine Activity-Based Electrical Stimulation Training in a Stroke Patient With Minimal Movement in the Paretic Upper Extremity Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 595 - 599. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R de Kroon and M. J IJzerman Electrical stimulation of the upper extremity in stroke: cyclic versus EMG-triggered stimulation Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 690 - 697. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chae, A. Ng, D. T. Yu, A. Kirsteins, E. P. Elovic, S. R. Flanagan, R. L. Harvey, R. D. Zorowitz, and Z.-P. Fang Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for Shoulder Pain in Hemiplegia: Does Time From Stroke Onset Predict Treatment Success? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 561 - 567. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Church, C. Price, A. D. Pandyan, S. Huntley, R. Curless, and H. Rodgers Response to Letter by Page and Chae Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): e72 - e73. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Hemmen and H.A.M. Seelen Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. R. Sheffler, M. T. Hennessey, G. G. Naples, and J. Chae Improvement in Functional Ambulation as a Therapeutic Effect of Peroneal Nerve Stimulation in Hemiplegia: Two Case Reports Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 366 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Carnaby-Mann and M. A. Crary Examining the Evidence on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Swallowing: A Meta-analysis Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 564 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E Sullivan and L. D Hedman Effects of home-based sensory and motor amplitude electrical stimulation on arm dysfunction in chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2007; 21(2): 142 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Leung, A. Moseley, S. Fereday, T. Jones, T. Fairbairn, and S. Wyndham The prevalence and characteristics of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2007; 21(2): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Church, C. Price, A. D. Pandyan, S. Huntley, R. Curless, and H. Rodgers Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to the Shoulder After Acute Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2995 - 3001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Yozbatiran, B. Donmez, N. Kayak, and O. Bozan Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for sensory and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 4 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-C. Chen, C.-C. Liang, and F.-Z. Shaw Facilitation of Sensory and Motor Recovery by Thermal Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2665 - 2669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hesse, C. Werner, M. Pohl, S. Rueckriem, J. Mehrholz, and M.L. Lingnau Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1960 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Gabr, P. Levine, and S. J Page Home-based electromyography-triggered stimulation in chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 737 - 745. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. U Jette, N. K Latham, R. J Smout, J. Gassaway, M. D Slavin, and S. D Horn Physical Therapy Interventions for Patients With Stroke in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Physical Therapy, March 1, 2005; 85(3): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. J Renzenbrink and M. J Ijzerman Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (P-NMES) for treating shoulder pain in chronic hemiplegia. Effects on shoulder pain and quality of life Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2004; 18(4): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chae and R. Hart Intramuscular Hand Neuroprosthesis for Chronic Stroke Survivors Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2003; 17(2): 109 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]