|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 8,
833-862 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr843oa
© 2004 SAGE Publications
The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?
R PS Van Peppen
Department of Physical Therapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
G Kwakkel
Department of Physical Therapy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam and Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine de Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands
S Wood-Dauphinee
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
H JM Hendriks
Dutch Institute of Allied Health Care (Npi), Amersfoort and Maastricht University, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ph J Van der Wees
Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF), Amersfoort, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
J Dekker
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO Institute), Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Objective: To determine the evidence for physical therapy interventions aimed at improving functional outcome after stroke.
Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, PEDro, EMBASE and DocOnline were searched for controlled studies. Physical therapy was divided into 10 intervention categories, which were analysed separately. If statistical pooling (weighted summary effect sizes) was not possible due to lack of comparability between interventions, patient characteristics and measures of outcome, a bestresearch synthesis was performed. This best-research synthesis was based on methodological quality (PEDro score).
Results: In total, 151 studies were included in this systematic review; 123 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 28 controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Methodological quality of all RCTs had a median of 5 points on the 10-point PEDro scale (range 28 points). Based on high-quality RCTs strong evidence was found in favour of task-oriented exercise training to restore balance and gait, and for strengthening the lower paretic limb. Summary effect sizes (SES) for functional outcomes ranged from 0.13 (95% CI 0.030.23) for effects of high intensity of exercise training to 0.92 (95% CI 0.541.29) for improving symmetry when moving from sitting to standing. Strong evidence was also found for therapies that were focused on functional training of the upper limb such as constraint-induced movement therapy (SES 0.46; 95% CI 0.070.91), treadmill training with or without body weight support, respectively 0.70 (95% CI 0.291.10) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.561.61), aerobics (SES 0.39; 95% CI 0.050.74), external auditory rhythms during gait (SES 0.91; 95% CI 0.401.42) and neuromuscular stimulation for glenohumeral subluxation (SES 1.41; 95% CI 0.762.06). No or insufficient evidence in terms of functional outcome was found for: traditional neurological treatment approaches; exercises for the upper limb; biofeedback; functional and neuromuscular electrical stimulation aimed at improving dexterity or gait performance; orthotics and assistive devices; and physical therapy interventions for reducing hemiplegic shoulder pain and hand oedema.
Conclusions: This review showed small to large effect sizes for task-oriented exercise training, in particular when applied intensively and early after stroke onset. In almost all high-quality RCTs, effects were mainly restricted to tasks directly trained in the exercise programme.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Donovan, S. E Lord, H. K McNaughton, and M. Weatherall
Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors
Clinical Rehabilitation,
June 1, 2008;
22(6):
556 - 563.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. N. Barker, S. G. Brauer, and R. G. Carson
Training of Reaching in Stroke Survivors With Severe and Chronic Upper Limb Paresis Using a Novel Nonrobotic Device: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Stroke,
June 1, 2008;
39(6):
1800 - 1807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dahl, T. Askim, R. Stock, E. Langorgen, S. Lydersen, and B. Indredavik
Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2008;
22(5):
436 - 447.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Meilink, B. Hemmen, H. Seelen, and G. Kwakkel
Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature
Clinical Rehabilitation,
April 1, 2008;
22(4):
291 - 305.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, L. De Wit, V. Thijs, J. Dobbelaere, H. Devos, D. Severijns, S. Vanbeveren, and W. De Weerdt
Time Course of Trunk, Arm, Leg, and Functional Recovery After Ischemic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
173 - 179.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Olivo, L. G. Macedo, I. C. Gadotti, J. Fuentes, T. Stanton, and D. J Magee
Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
Physical Therapy,
February 1, 2008;
88(2):
156 - 175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J Sullivan, D. A Brown, T. Klassen, S. Mulroy, T. Ge, S. P Azen, C. J Winstein, and for the Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network
Effects of Task-Specific Locomotor and Strength Training in Adults Who Were Ambulatory After Stroke: Results of the STEPS Randomized Clinical Trial
Physical Therapy,
December 1, 2007;
87(12):
1580 - 1602.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J M. Lowe, K. L Barker, M. Dewey, and C. M Sackley
Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ,
October 20, 2007;
335(7624):
812 - 812.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Roerdink, C. J. Lamoth, G. Kwakkel, P. C. van Wieringen, and P. J Beek
Gait Coordination After Stroke: Benefits of Acoustically Paced Treadmill Walking
Physical Therapy,
August 1, 2007;
87(8):
1009 - 1022.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Allison and R. Dennett
Pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of additional supported standing practice on functional ability post stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation,
July 1, 2007;
21(7):
614 - 619.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mayr, M. Kofler, E. Quirbach, H. Matzak, K. Frohlich, and L. Saltuari
Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2007;
21(4):
307 - 314.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, A. Van de Winckel, and W. De Weerdt
Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2007;
21(5):
387 - 394.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Nieuwboer, G Kwakkel, L Rochester, D Jones, E van Wegen, A M Willems, F Chavret, V Hetherington, K Baker, and I Lim
Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
February 1, 2007;
78(2):
134 - 140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Dobkin
Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2007;
21(1):
3 - 13.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Underwood, P. C Clark, S. Blanton, D. M Aycock, and S. L Wolf
Pain, Fatigue, and Intensity of Practice in People With Stroke Who Are Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2006;
86(9):
1241 - 1250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Y. Pang, J. J Eng, A. S Dawson, and S. Gylfadottir
The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation,
February 1, 2006;
20(2):
97 - 111.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Olney, J. Nymark, B. Brouwer, E. Culham, A. Day, J. Heard, M. Henderson, and K. Parvataneni
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Supervised Versus Unsupervised Exercise Programs for Ambulatory Stroke Survivors
Stroke,
February 1, 2006;
37(2):
476 - 481.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|