This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Luke, C. Articles by Brock, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Luke, C. Articles by Brock, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke

School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University and Physiotherapy Department, Angliss Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Karen J Dodd

School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Kim Brock

Physiotherapy Department, St Vincents Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the Bobath concept at reducing upper limb impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions after stroke.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant trials published between 1966 and 2003. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for the following inclusion criteria: population of adults with upper limb disability after stroke; stated use of the Bobath concept aimed at improving upper limb disability in isolation from other approaches; outcomes reflecting changes in upper limb impairment, activity limitation or participation restriction.

Results: Of the 688 articles initially identified, eight met the inclusion criteria. Five were randomized controlled trials, one used a single-group crossover design and two were single-case design studies. Five studies measured impairments including shoulder pain, tone, muscle strength and motor control. The Bobath concept was found to reduce shoulder pain better than cryotherapy, and to reduce tone compared to no intervention and compared to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). However, no difference was detected for changes in tone between the Bobath concept and a functional approach. Differences did not reach significance for measures of muscle strength and motor control. Six studies measured activity limitations, none of these found the Bobath concept was superior to other therapy approaches. Two studies measured changes in participation restriction and both found equivocal results.

Conclusions: Comparisons of the Bobath concept with other approaches do not demonstrate superiority of one approach over the other at improving upper limb impairment, activity or participation. However, study limitations relating to methodological quality, the outcome measures used and contextual factors investigated limit the ability to draw conclusions. Future research should use sensitive upper limb measures, trained Bobath therapists and homogeneous samples to identify the influence of patient factors on the response to therapy approaches.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 8, 888-898 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr793oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Kollen, S. Lennon, B. Lyons, L. Wheatley-Smith, M. Scheper, J. H. Buurke, J. Halfens, A. C.H. Geurts, and G. Kwakkel The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence? Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): e89 - e97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]