|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study
Thomas Platz
Cosima Pinkowski
Klinik Berlin, Abteilung für Neurologische Rehabilitation, Charité = Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Frederike van Wijck
Centre for Rehabilitation and Engineering Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
In-Ha Kim
Kim Klinik Berlin, Abteilung für Neurologische Rehabilitation, Charité = Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Paolo di Bella
Centro per lo Studio ed il Trattamento dei Neurolesi Lungodegenti, Messina, Italy
Garth Johnson
Centre for Rehabilitation and Engineering Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Objectives: To establish: (1) inter-rater and testretest reliability of standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer upper limb section, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test in patients with paresis secondary to stroke, multiple sclerosis or traumatic brain injury and (2) correlation between these arm motor scales and more general measures of impairment and activity limitation.
Design: Multicentre cohort study.
Setting: Three European referral centres for neurorehabilitation.
Subjects: Thirty-seven stroke, 14 multiple sclerosis and five traumatic brain injury patients.
Main measures: Scores of the Fugl-Meyer Test (arm section), Action Research Arm Test, and Box and Block Test derived from video information.
Results: All three motor tests showed very high inter-rater and testretest reliability (ICC and rho for main variables>0.95). Correlation between the motor scales was very high (rho>0.92). Motor scales correlated moderately highly with the Hemispheric Stroke Scale, a measure of impairment (rho=0.6600.689), but not with the Modified Barthel Index, a measure of the ability to cope with basic activities of daily living (rho=0.0440.086).
Conclusions: The standardized guidelines assured comparability of test administration and scoring across clinical facilities. The arm motor scales provided information that was not identical to information from the Hemispheric Stroke Scale or the Modified Barthel Index. Address for correspondence: Priv.-Doz. Dr T Platz, Klinik Berlin, Kladower Damm 223, 14089 Berlin, Germany.
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 4,
404-411 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Platz, S. van Kaick, J. Mehrholz, O. Leidner, C. Eickhof, and M. Pohl
Best Conventional Therapy Versus Modular Impairment-Oriented Training for Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2009;
23(7):
706 - 716.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Lin, M.-J. Hsu, C.-F. Sheu, T.-S. Wu, R.-T. Lin, C.-H. Chen, and C.-L. Hsieh
Psychometric Comparisons of 4 Measures for Assessing Upper-Extremity Function in People With Stroke
Physical Therapy,
August 1, 2009;
89(8):
840 - 850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-c. Lin, Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, C.-l. Chen, Y. Jang, and J.-s. Liu
Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
429 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K.-l. Chan, R. K.-y. Tong, and K. Y.-k. Chung
Bilateral Upper Limb Training With Functional Electric Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
357 - 365.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. de Bode, S. L Fritz, K. Weir-Haynes, and G. W Mathern
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Individuals After Cerebral Hemispherectomy: A Case Series
Physical Therapy,
April 1, 2009;
89(4):
361 - 369.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-l. Chen, and J.-s. Liu
Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke,
April 1, 2009;
40(4):
1386 - 1391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Casadio, P. Giannoni, P. Morasso, and V. Sanguineti
A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
217 - 228.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Harvey, C. J. Winstein, and for the Everest Trial Group
Design for the Everest Randomized Trial of Cortical Stimulation and Rehabilitation for Arm Function Following Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
32 - 44.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Turk, S. V. Notley, R. M. Pickering, D. M. Simpson, P. A. Wright, and J. H. Burridge
Reliability and Sensitivity of a Wrist Rig to Measure Motor Control and Spasticity in Poststroke Hemiplegia
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
November 1, 2008;
22(6):
684 - 696.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J Sullivan, S. S Kantak, and P. A Burtner
Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition
Physical Therapy,
June 1, 2008;
88(6):
720 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow
Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke
Brain,
May 1, 2008;
131(5):
1381 - 1390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, L. De Wit, V. Thijs, J. Dobbelaere, H. Devos, D. Severijns, S. Vanbeveren, and W. De Weerdt
Time Course of Trunk, Arm, Leg, and Functional Recovery After Ischemic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
173 - 179.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Dunning, A. Berberich, B. Albers, K. Mortellite, P. G Levine, V. A Hill Hermann, and S. J Page
A Four-Week, Task-Specific Neuroprosthesis Program for a Person With No Active Wrist or Finger Movement Because of Chronic Stroke
Physical Therapy,
March 1, 2008;
88(3):
397 - 405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Yozbatiran, L. Der-Yeghiaian, and S. C. Cramer
A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
February 1, 2008;
22(1):
78 - 90.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M Wagner, C. E Lang, S. A Sahrmann, D. F Edwards, and A. W Dromerick
Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Performance in Subjects With Poststroke Hemiparesis During the First Few Months of Recovery
Physical Therapy,
June 1, 2007;
87(6):
751 - 765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Alon, A. F. Levitt, and P. A. McCarthy
Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2007;
21(3):
207 - 215.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Page, P. Levine, and A. Leonard
Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Stroke,
April 1, 2007;
38(4):
1293 - 1297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mehrholz, K. Rutte, and M. Pohl
Jump training is feasible for nearly ambulatory patients after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2006;
20(5):
406 - 412.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T Platz, C Eickhof, S van Kaick, U Engel, C Pinkowski, S Kalok, and M Pause
Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation,
July 1, 2005;
19(7):
714 - 724.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|