This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pollock, A. Articles by Pomeroy, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pollock, A. Articles by Pomeroy, V. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review

Stroke Therapy Evaluation Programme, Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, alex{at}strokerehab.fsnet.co.uk

Gillian Baer

Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh

Peter Langhorne

Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow

Valerie Pomeroy

Rehabilitation and Ageing, Geriatric Medicine, St George's University of London, London, UK

Objectives : To determine whether there is a difference in global dependency and functional independence in patients with stroke associated with different approaches to physiotherapy treatment.

Data sources : We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched May 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2005), EMBASE (1980 to May 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to May 2005). We contacted experts and researchers with an interest in stroke rehabilitation.

Review methods : Inclusion criteria were: (a) randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials; (b) adults with a clinical diagnosis of stroke; (c) physiotherapy treatment approaches aimed at promoting postural control and lower limb function; (d) measures of disability, motor impairment or participation. Two independent reviewers categorized identified trials according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, documented the methodological quality and extracted the data.

Results : Twenty trials (1087 patients) were included in the review. Comparisons included: neurophysiological approach versus other approach; motor learning approach versus other approach; mixed approach versus other approach for the outcomes of global dependency and functional independence. A mixed approach was significantly more effective than no treatment control at improving functional independence (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 1.80). There were no significant differences found for any other comparisons.

Conclusions : Physiotherapy intervention, using a `mix' of components from different `approaches' is more effective than no treatment control in attaining functional independence following stroke. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that any one physiotherapy `approach' is more effective in promoting recovery of disability than any other approach.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 5, 395-410 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507073438


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?